☆ The Giver of Stars ☆ PDF Read by ☆ Jojo Moyes PDF, DOC, TXT, eBook or Kindle ePUB free

[ Book] ✓ The Giver of Stars PDF by Jojo Moyes Ö PDF, DOC, TXT, eBook or Kindle ePUB free

❮PDF / Epub❯ ☃ Ekaterinburg. The last days of the Romanovs Author Helen Rappaport – Cravenjobs.co.uk

files Ekaterinburg. The last days of the Romanovs, read online Ekaterinburg. The last days of the Romanovs, free Ekaterinburg. The last days of the Romanovs, free Ekaterinburg. The last days of the Romanovs, Ekaterinburg. The last days of the Romanovs 3d8526f30 On The Sweltering Summer Night Of July In The Siberian City Of Ekaterinburg, A Group Of Assassins Led An Unsuspecting Tsar Nicholas II Of Russia, His Wife, The Tsarina Alexandra, The Desperately Ill Tsarevich, And Their Four Beautiful Daughters, Olga, Tatiana, Maria, And Anastasia, Into A Basement Room Where They Were Shot And Then Bayoneted To Death This Is The Story Of Those Murders, Which Ended Three Hundred Years Of Romanov Rule And Set Their Stamp On An Era Of State Orchestrated Terror And Brutal Repression The Last Days Of The Romanovs Counts Down To The Last, Tense Hours Of The Family S Lives, Stripping Away The Over Romanticized Versions Of Previous Accounts The Story Focuses On The Family Inside The Ipatiev House, Capturing The Oppressive Atmosphere And The Dynamics Of A Group The Romanovs, Their Servants, And Guards Thrown Together By Extraordinary EventsMarshaling Overlooked Evidence From Key Witnesses Such As The British Consul To Ekaterinburg, Sir Thomas Preston, American And British Travelers In Siberia, And The Now Forgotten American Journalist Herman Bernstein, Helen Rappaport Gives A Brilliant Account Of The Political Forces Swirling Through The Remote Urals Town She Conveys The Tension Of The Watching World The Kaiser Of Germany And George V, King Of England Both, Like Alexandra, Grandchildren Of Queen Victoria Their Nations Locked In Combat As The First World War Drew To Its Bitter End And She Draws On Recent Releases From The Russian Archives To Challenge The View That The Deaths Were A Unilateral Act By A Maverick Group Of The Ekaterinburg Bolsheviks, Identifying A Chain Of Command That Stretches Directly, She Believes, To Moscow And To Lenin Himself Telling The Story In A Compellingly New And Dramatic Way, The Last Days Of The Romanovs Brings Those Final Tragic Days Vividly Alive Against The Backdrop Of Russia In Turmoil, On The Brink Of A Devastating Civil War

10 thoughts on “Ekaterinburg. The last days of the Romanovs

  1. says:

    Yurovksy, having finished reading the decree, pulled out his Colt, stepped forward and shot the Tsar at point blank range in the chest Ermakov, Kudrin and Medvedev, not to be outdone and wanting their moment of personal revenge and glory too, immediately took aim and fired at Nicholas as well, followed by most of the others, propelling an arc of blood and tissue over his terrified son behind him For a moment the Tsar s body quivered on the spot, his eyes fixated and wide, his chest cavities, ripped open by bullets, now frothing with oxygenated blood, his heart speeding up, all in a vain attempt to pump blood round his traumatized body Then he quietly crumpled to the floor But at least Nicholas was spared the sight of seeing what happened to his wife and family Helen Rappaport, The Last Days of the Romanovs This is a species of horror story where you know the ending in advance of cracking the front cover Before you read the first word on the first page, you know that it will end in a claustrophobic basement room, choked with smoke and the metallic scent of blood, with bodies including children riddled with bullets Helen Rappaport s The Last Days of the Romanovs is a slim volume recounting in strict narrative fashion the final anxious hours of the Romanov dynasty, from the time they arrived in Ekaterinburg, to the moment they were walked to the basement of the utterly Soviet named House of Special Purpose It ends badly for the Romanovs, for Nicholas II and his beloved family It ends in such a way that you ll start to wonder if you haven t already why 20th Century Fox ever felt it appropriate to spin a motion picture with talking animals out of this gory massacre Each of the sixteen chapters in The Last Days of The Romanovs there is also a brief introduction and epilogue covers a day, or span of days, in the fast fading lives of ex Tsar Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra, their hemophiliac son Alexei, and their four young daughters Intermingled with a claustrophobic and personality based retelling of those fraught days balanced upon the edge of the unknown cut off from the outside world waiting for a rescue that never seriously materialized are mini biographies of the all the Romanovs, as well as some of their captors tormentors As I mentioned above, Rappaport chooses to tell her story purely as a narrative This is not an academic or scholarly work The deaths of the Romanovs is a historical incident that is tangled in countless controversies, myths, speculations, lies, and half truths Rappaport, however, has made her own study of it, and seamlessly presents her version of events This makes for easy reading Rather than stutter, stop, and restart in order to quibble with every different variation, Rappaport can focus on the personalities, the atmosphere, the slow and inexorable tightening of the noose Of course, as Rappaport acknowledges in an afterword, this involves a great deal of subjective interpretation Based on her reputation, she is entitled to this, and to some extent, all historians and writers are subjective in their staging Still, I disagree with Rappaport s decision to not provide footnotes or endnotes She s not the only popular historian author to do this, and their excuse is always the same they don t want to clutter the tale But that s just laziness Annotated endnotes can be used without any kind of notation in the body of the text The general reader can absorb the story without the distraction of tiny numbers at the end of sentences the interested reader can turn to the back for citations and further discussion This isn t really a criticism, because again, I understand her purpose to grip the reader and not let go To that end, this book is extremely effective and well paced and imbued with Rappaport s empathy for her subjects As tightly as The Last Days of the Romanovs is constructed, it is inevitable that you lose a lot of context This is not through any fault of Rappaport, of course She did not set out to tell the whole crazy sad tale of the Romanovs and the Russian Revolution With that said, I often find that certain books work better when you go into it with a bit of an overarching framework in you mind The murder of the Romanovs was not an execution but a shocking act of bestial savagery But it also took place within a hugely complicated environment Rappaport definitely feels a great deal of emotion for the Romanovs, and that is mostly for the good Still, it elides a bit of the overall truth of the family The Nicholas of The Last Days of the Romanovs is a quiet, humble, dignified man, who stoically and uncomplainingly accepts the slings and arrows of the Ural Soviet His wife, Alexandra, is a sickly, pitiable woman, leeching energy and strength from her young daughters There is little indication of the weakness and paradoxical nature of the bumbling Nicholas II, which led him to both hate his job and to cling to its autocratic foundations until it was too late He was a great family man, but also a rabid anti Semite He claimed to want nothing than to be an English farmer, yet he did not believe in ceding anything to democracy, even when the clamor became deafening There is also little criticism of Alexandra, who attempted to wield power on Nicholas s behalf while he was at Stavka, and heeded no advice save what came to her from incompetent sycophants She was a loyal partner, but loyal to a fault, urging Nicholas II to double down on every mistake It is perhaps understandable that Rappaport shies away from sharp critiques of the Romanovs After all, what came after them was far, far worse For all Nicholas II s mistakes, he didn t indifferently condemn millions to death by starvation like Stalin, and he didn t fetishize the firing squad like Lenin In a way, the destruction of the Romanov family, and especially the children Alexei, Olga, Tatiana, Marie, and Anastasia symbolizes the blind indifference to humanity exhibited by the Bolsheviks as they clawed their way to power This was not a necessary act It was an act of violence for the sake of violence The men who carried it out were drunks, criminals, psychopaths They did not wade in the blood of the Romanovs for the good of mankind they did not fondle the body of the dead tsarina in support of the proletariat They did these things because the opportunity arose for them to act on their darkest impulses I strongly recommend reading this in conjunction with Rappaport s The Romanov Sisters, which breathes individual life into Olga, Tatiana, Marie, and Anastasia, four young women who are often lumped together by historians Taking these two books back to back provides a full and powerful reading experience that left me bereft for this flawed, doomed family Nicholas and Alexander had their chances, made their mistakes, and paid the ultimate price The children, though, were simply caught up in the maelstrom, like so many others of their countrymen and women To look at their pictures is to feel the chill of a ghost brushing your arm Theirs are the faces young, attractive, frozen unaware in black and white portraits of a calamity that defies human understanding They somehow stand for the millions who died in the sad agony of Russia s convulsion, and the millions who were to die in years to come.

  2. says:

    One fascinating historical book about the Romanovs and a close look to their last days, their killers and the legacy of the stunning famous family I wrote about them in my review of The Romanov Sisters The Lost Lives of the Daughters of Nicholas and Alexandra The Last Days of the Romanovs Tragedy at Ekaterinburg is a sad, touching book with an emotional end There was only one member of the family left, waiting for them to return, but it didn t happen The cruelty of the massacre and the brutality of the plan how to hide the bodies, still make me shudder.

  3. says:

    A minha pancada por certas figuras hist ricas continua Desta vez a fam lia Romanov, mais concretamente Nicolau II, o ltimo czar e a sua fam lia N o preciso fazerem grandes pesquisas para saberem o triste fim que tiveram A autora vai mais al m disso S o retratadas motiva es, esperan as, medos, ingenuidades, indiferen as Excelente pesquisa O livro tem bastante ritmo apesar do que contado um livro de n o fic o essencial para apreciadores da hist ria dos Romanov.

  4. says:

    A vis o que a autora nos traz neste livro bastante diferente dos livros que tinha lido at ent o sobre a fam lia Romanov, porque n o se cinge a defender a fam lia imperial e nem a criticar o comunismo Ela exp e a verdade que conseguiu descortinar sem passar paninhos quentes a ningu m certo que nunca se vai saber exactamente o que aconteceu, porque muitos relatos eram aldrabados e a documenta o tamb m era tendenciosa Mas neste livro senti que tudo o que me estavam a contar o mais pr ximo da realidade poss vel Por outro lado, a autora n o se centra s na fam lia Romanov, explica nos o ponto de vista dos bolcheviques e o porqu de odiarem o czar e a czarina e conta nos como foram os ltimos 14 dias na ltima morada da fam lia, tendo por base o contexto pol tico da poca A vis o romantizada a que tive acesso em outras obras, nesta foi erradicada O czar n o era um bom imperador e a sua mulher n o era a melhor pessoa para o aconselhar, apenas os filhos n o tinham culpa nenhuma do que viria a lhes acontecer Assim, apenas duas ideias que j tinha ficaram n o havia necessidade de fuzilar os filhos, que nunca tiveram poder nas suas m os, e aquela fam lia teria sido muito feliz se n o tivesse o apelido Romanov, uma vez que os seus membros se amavam e adoravam ter podido levar uma vida simples, longe do poder.

  5. says:

    I m probably not being fair in giving this book 4 stars, but I can t help it It s my never ending itch that no history book written by women can scratch I am not being a misoginistic arsehole, it s just my frank opinion This has probably been the direct effect of the latest history book that I read, which is The End by Ian Kershaw Now that s master class retelling of some or other part of humanity s history However, it s not just that particular work that influenced my view on the matter By comparison, this seemed filled with pointless and rather boring opinions about the situation of the Romanovs from 1890 through to 17th of July, 1918 Now, don t get me wrong I fully enjoyed all the details and I found out things that I wouldn t have, had they not been presented here What I m pointing out is that I could sense it was written by a woman Hear me out I don t want any sentiments in my history books I want an author who, even if he s passionate about the subject and can rant about it for days, it won t show on paper I want an objective speaker who doesn t interfere with my emotions or alters my feelings towards a certain event, but rather lets me decide how I feel about it after giving me all the details he could Ekaterinburg is not one of those works From the very first page, I felt like I was bullied into caring for the members of this famous family, even their dogs , and despise their guardians and any other by stander who allowed something like this to happen For the record, I do care about the Romanovs and I think the animals who did what they did are no better than scum for acting in such a way That does not, anyhow, affect my opinion that it shouldn t be the author of this history book who presses me into thinking this way In the end, 4 stars Filled with precious information about this illustrious family, it s a good read for anyone interested in the subject.

  6. says:

    After finishing The Romanov Sisters The Lost Lives of the Daughters of Nicholas and Alexandra, I picked up this book hoping for insight into the family and their last days at Tobolsk and Ekaterinburg This was a riveting historical account, tightly paced than The Romanov Sisters.I didn t care for the off topic meandering in The Romanov Sisters however, I felt like the broader historical information in this book was not only on point, but vitally necessary in order to show how the Romanovs were caught up in larger social and political forces sweeping Russia Through a detailed exploration of the events leading up to the execution, the book shows why the Bolsheviks ultimately chose to murder the family and why the crowned heads of Europe many of them close relatives of the Romanovs failed to rescue them I especially appreciated how much of the book focused on the political and symbolic significance of the city of Ekaterinburg.In short, I would recommend this book over The Romanov Sisters to anyone interested in the Romanov family This book includes detailed biographical information on each member of the family, as well as an exploration of the broader events of this time period It is a tremendously moving, well researched and well written account of not only the Romanovs last days, but also of this turbulent period in Russian history.

  7. says:

    I m always disturbed at the romanticized and saccharined portrayal of the Romanov murders It seems wrong to cannonize the dynasty that inflicted torture, exile, imprisonment, and death upon its people Equally, in my mind, Nicholas II only received the same treatment he gave to many of his subjectsmurder Especially in Nicholas s case, I don t think the calm, devoted family man image redeems his strictly autocratic and anti Semitic rule as monarch For a monarch to turn the other way while his subjects 85% of whom were peasants starved or suffered from the charming, Eastern European tradition of pogroms on its vast Jewish population.That said, I find Rappaport s work to be very straight forwardmentioning the good and bad aspects of both Nicholas and Lenin I learned a lot about the politics and warfare occuring during this era, as opposed to the melodramatic and almost morbid fascination with the family s grotesque murder I enjoyed, too, how Rappaport gives unbiased information on the Bolshevik executionersnot entirely condemning them, but not letting them off the hook, either.Overall, a very informative read.

  8. says:

    A readable, fast paced and interesting history of the Romanov family s demise.The narrative covers the family s last two weeks at Ekaterinburg, as well as the tsar s decision to abdicate and how the family got there Rappaport also covers the interactions between the local soviet and the Moscow regime The Soviet leadership, by then trying to crush the Whites, had basically lost interest in the family s fate they didn t want the Whites to get anywhere near them, but that was about it The decision to execute the family was made quickly and the communists quickly moved on after that and rescuing the family was a low priority for the allies Her treatment of Yurovsky is a bit nuanced than usual.The narrative is a bit repetitive, and there are no footnotes The prose is a bit pedestrian at times Also, like most books on the subject, the Romanov daughters are lumped together and we don t really get to know them as individuals Rappaport treats the czar with sympathy, although this seems a bit naive at times But, in all, an intimate, well written work.

  9. says:

    Oh, where to begin Where to begin I bought this book in December 2012 while I was on an HPB run on lunch from a cataloging workshop I wasn t expecting high scholarship, if only from the terrible cover To the smart aleck saying not to judge books by their covers, let me take a second and tell you why this cover is worthy of judgment It s anyone s guess why this woman decided to put a cover on said book featuring a red tinted, badly shopped image of the 1902 Rothschild egg over the 1914 Livadia portrait of the Imperial family Please notice the idiotically superimposed Imperial eagle right over the cockerel s neck The shop job is so bad that in person, you can see the pixels.But I digress Having very little expectation but willing to spend 2 to see what she had to say, I bought the book and read it as part of last year s alphabetical challenge The back cover praises Rappaport for a fair and unbiased treatment of her subject matter, but as you can imagine, a woman with such credits as Lenin in Exile, Joseph Stalin A Biographical Companion, and the Encyclopedia of Women Social Reformers, she was about as balanced as a chocolate diet Mostly all she does is use the word hagiographer incessantly and dedicate whole paragraphs to demeaning these supposed flattering biographers, whoever they are Greg King her obvious mentor and responsible for chunks of her ridiculous bibliography praises her to the skies All this told me that this nonfiction work was going to be this close to a waste of time.But librarians read things that are wastes of time Why So you don t have to Let me break down not only what made this book so terrible or what made me dislike it so much, if you re a stickler but also why you shouldn t read it Go ahead, judge the book by its cover Because this crudely podged together cover is a perfect summation of the slapped together idiocy that passes for the book s scholarship Frankly I don t think Rappaport could understand real scholarship if it hit her in the head I mentioned her bibliography a second ago it doesn t even deserve the name From misspelled names to flat out incorrect titles, she makes every mistake in the book including the first mistake everyone makes in freshman composition, which is to split the bib into primary and secondary sources and then define primary as stuff I used the most and secondary for stuff I didn t use that much The sources she chose to use and the ones she decided to skip were also telling For example, she didn t cite Grand Duke Dmitri Pavlovich s biography even though he was Nicholas Favorite, his aide for many years, and also deeply involved in the murder of Rasputin She also doesn t reference his sister s autobiography, the two volume memoirs of Grand Duchess Marie You might defend this by pointing out that this book focused on the last days of the Romanovs and neither of those two were around for that, but I would answer that 1 she spent so much time skipping through dates that their lack is conspicuous and odd, and 2 she referenced others who were just as little involved in the actual last days Paul Bulygin, for example, is an early witness but an unreliable one Not to mention sources she must have used and didn t bother to put in the bib at all when I came across a quotation that I knew where she had gotten it, I found it impossible to find the citation in either her primary or her secondary sources Oh, and by the way, I had to recall where the quotation came from because she never cited anything in the text.Now, she wrote this book in a narrative style that jumps back and forth in the timeline, apparently just to give her enough words to pad out each chapter, and maybe for that reason she decided against using any kind of system whatsoever to identify quotations, paraphrases, or other references to information she didn t just make up off the top of her head On the other hand, the advantage to reference free writing is you can make up whatever you want off the top of your head and no one will know the difference For example, if I subtly slipped into the next paragraph that she wrote extensively about the empress pet green hippo, you d have no way of knowing this wasn t true Even if it sounds peculiar, you couldn t determine if I was lying without clapping hands on the document Now imagine if I were discussing some 40 or 50 documents the only way you d know I was talking crazy is 1 to sift through the dozens of documents yourself, or 2 know the subject well enough to know In the meantime, plenty of ignorant readers who don t know or care to find out will blithely carry on the misinformation about a green hippo And that s why it makes me angry.Honestly, that sums up the gravest faults of the book and there s not much else to say I suppose she thought she divided it cleverly a chapter for each day of the final week, and each chapter day being dedicated to one of the family, because, how creative, there s seven of them and seven days But she followed nothing close to a timeline, starting with events in 1917 and then jumping around, back to Nicholas childhood, forward to 1918, back to 1904, back again, forward, back And outright mistakes aren t limited to the bibliography either She couldn t get Michael Romanov s name or the details of his death right, and while the American President Wilson gets a page and a half of flowery, poetic description, Nicholas is repeatedly condemned for the apparent crime of not doing things Helen Rappaport and Greg King s way Wilson wasn t the only random she jumped around to, either, and all these other unrelated individuals seemed to get positive treatment than the Romanovs themselves especially poor Alexandra, whom she framed as a terrible wife and mother, a hypochondriac who drove her husband nearly insane, and also little Alexei, whom she basically denounced as a brat Unable to conceive of a loving, tightly knit Christian family, Rappaport depicts the Romanovs final days as the torment of a fractured, fragmented group held together by nothing than their captivity Not only did she make me feel like they all welcomed death just to escape one another, she made me rather long for death as well So much of this book is useless, unverifiable padding, and cruel fantasy where the jabs at Nicholas and Alex s marriage are concerned This book doesn t even deserve to be flung across the room, as Dorothy Parker would say don t even do it the honor of picking it up Review via Hundredaire Socialite

  10. says:

    POTENTIAL SPOILERS I m honestly not quite sure how to review this I mean, not very much time is dedicated to the Romanovs at all They all have their own separate chapters of course, minus the four sisters, who were all squished into one chapter but had separate sections for themselves That was all fine and good, although most of the book is describing the atmosphere of Ekaterinburg, and the family s servants, and their killers, which is all fine and good since I did learn a lot of stuff I hadn t known before, like how a lot of Yakov s friends were Lithuanian and Latvian snipers, but this book is called The Last Days of the Romanovs, and I felt like I didn t really get that At the end of the chapters, it would briefly go over what the family did on that particular day, and that was it I felt like we didn t really get to know anything about what they did or how they felt in their final days And I do like how the book is structured so each chapter corresponds to whatever day that was in real life, all leading up to July 17th, the morning of their murders I thought that was a pretty clever choice, although again, I do wish of the time was spent actually with the Romanovs instead of talking about Lenin s backstory Like, if I wanted to know about Lenin, then I would look him up myself He doesn t really have much to do with the Romanovs However, I will address what I m sure most people are wanting me to address this book does talk about their murder, and it doesn t gloss anything over either I ve read books and articles and essays and whatnot about the Romanovs execution, but I think this is the only time where I have outwardly cringed at the action Not because it was badly written, but of how detailed it was It honestly does make me feel bad for adoring the five children and finding them charming and cute and lovable I mean, I don t want to go too much into detail for anybody with weak stomachs, but let s just say, Alexei was splattered with his father s brains after he was shot right next to him, according to this book It made my stomach turn, and I m usually immune to such things I will give the author props for tearing down the romanticized vision of the murder most people seem to have, and the romanticized version of the family in general Despite that though, many descriptions in this book were pretty boring I don t care too much for politics, and this book was VERY politics heavy I could hardly keep the similar sounding Russian names straight in my head, nor the party abbreviations A lot of reviewers said this book didn t explain the Russian Revolution very well and that an expert would understand it better well I m an expert and I have no idea what s going on A few topics were interesting, like stated before the amount of Latvian and Lithuanian soldiers that were involved in the murders, or the female Russian soldier Mariya who won several awards and even a high military honor for her work in WW1, but that was pretty much it As stated before, this book was barely about the Romanovs, which is the reason why I read it Also, I m not a fan of that cover, it looks really poorly made Like, separately those pictures might work, but together they just look really messy She should ve just done what every other biographer about the Romanovs does put one of their family pictures on the cover It s been done to death, sure, but it s obviously effective otherwise nobody would do it Or maybe just a picture of the House of Special Purpose, or something, just not all together like that Overall, this book wasn t terrible, but I only recommend it for people like me who already know a lot about the Russian Empire in this time period and know a lot about the Romanovs on top of that, otherwise this book will just confuse you even than it did me Oh, and you must have a strong stomach, I am NOT kidding about how graphic that execution scene is And it makes it even disturbing when you realize that it actually happened II need something happy to think about now There we go God I love that movie.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *